This sentence is particularly good: "The most immediate failure of the market mechanism lies in the things that the market leaves undone."Ideas about changing the organization of society in the long run are clearly needed, quite apart from strategies for dealing with an immediate crisis. I would separate out three questions from the many that can be raised. First, do we really need some kind of "new capitalism" rather than an economic system that is not monolithic, draws on a variety of institutions chosen pragmatically, and is based on social values that we can defend ethically?
The second question concerns the kind of economics that is needed today, especially in light of the present economic crisis. How do we assess what is taught and championed among academic economists as a guide to economic policy—including the revival of Keynesian thought in recent months as the crisis has grown fierce? More particularly, what does the present economic crisis tell us about the institutions and priorities to look for? Third, in addition to working our way toward a better assessment of what long-term changes are needed, we have to think—and think fast—about how to get out of the present crisis with as little damage as possible.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Thoughts on Capitalism
In the New York Review of Books, Amartya Sen offers up a primer on Adam Smith, John Maynard Keynes, and Alfred Cecil Pigou. Sen writes:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment